FOIA’d Emails in Kiwane Carrington Case Reveal Monitoring of Local Activist Groups
On November 3, 2009, several people spoke before Champaign city council about the police killing of Kiwane Carrington and demanded that Police Chief R.T. Finney, who was at the scene, be fired. After public comments, City Manager Steve Carter responded by saying that he had conducted his own investigation, talking to the state police and State’s Attorney Julia Rietz, and concluded that Finney had done nothing wrong. “He is an excellent police chief,” Carter said.
Upon hearing this, CU Citizens for Peace and Justice decided to file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for all the correspondence between Carter and local officials to find out more about this supposed investigation. While no documents were provided related to the details of the case (most of these conversations were probably done in person or on the phone, leaving no paper trail), emails exchanged show that local authorities were sharing information about community organizing in the wake of the shooting. Emails were being forwarded to Steve Carter from mass emails being sent out by CU Citizens for Peace and Justice (CUCPJ) and posted to listservs maintained by the Anti-War Anti-Racist Effort (AWARE), Students Transforming Oppression and Privilege (STOP), and the lesbian/feminist chorus Amasong.
Emails collected show that even the local mainstream media was participating in this information sharing. On Monday morning, Oct. 12, CUCPJ was planning a press conference at the IMC with family members of the two youth involved in the incident. Steve Bauer of the News-Gazette sent an email to Deputy Police Chief Troy Daniels inquiring about a Champaign Community and Police (CCAP) meeting and notifying him, “As you probably know, there is a press conference at 10 a.m. Monday at the Independent Media Center.”
After audio and video of the press conference was posted at the IMC web site, an email with the link was sent to the Amasong list, as well as the notice of an upcoming vigil. Council member Deb Feinan, who is on the list, forwarded the email to Steve Carter, the City Manager’s Assistant Joan Walls, and Neighborhood Services Director Dorothy David with the message, “I thought you would like to see the latest in case you haven’t seen it.” Feinan also forwarded an email the next week calling for people to attend a city council meeting and a Speak Out event at the Boys and Girls Club.
On Wednesday, Oct. 14, a vigil was held attended by hundreds of community members and followed by an appearance by State Senator and Vice-President of Operation Push, Rev. James Meeks at the New Hope Church of God. Rev. Meeks gave a rousing speech to a crowded room and demanded justice. An email from earlier in the week on Monday indicates that Will Kyles, the only African American city council member, was trying to pacify the city authorities about Meeks’ visit. Steve Carter sent a message to Dorothy David, Joan Walls, and Chief Finney saying that Kyles had told him the “primary reason” Meeks was in town was not for the Carrington case, but to “solicit support for [Cheryle] Jackson’s bid for the US Senate…. He was not intending to get involved in the community issue. Will wanted me to pass that along.” When Meeks was told about Carrington’s killing the next day by members of CUCPJ, he willingly spoke to the community.
Former African American city council member Gina Jackson was receiving emails I had sent to the AWARE list and forwarding several of them to Steve Carter. On October 19, I sent out an email about an upcoming march from the Illinois Terminal, past the Champaign police station, and to Boys and Girls Club. It was forwarded to Chief Finney, who sent it on to police command staff members Troy Daniels, John Murphy, and Holly Nearing. This email, in part, was the reason why on the night of the march the police station was surrounded in yellow tape, with 8-10 police standing at the entrance and reportedly more waiting in the lobby to respond to a possible riot.
Most disturbing was the realization that the head of the local chapter of the NAACP, Rev. Jerome Chambers, was forwarding my emails to city authorities. On Tuesday, Nov. 3, I sent out an email to the STOP list about that night’s city council meeting in which we were addressing the Champaign Police Department’s seeking of accreditation from the Illinois Law Enforcement Accreditation Program (ILEAP). Rev. Chambers passed the email to Steve Carter with the comment, “FYI as promised.”
I had the opportunity to ask Carter what Chambers had promised him. Carter admitted they may have been sharing information about activities planned, but said he had “no recollection” of anything promised to him by Chambers. When I asked Chambers about the email, he said he did not “deliberately” send it to Carter and pleaded, “I don’t want you to do a number on me.” Yet he would not explain what he had promised to Carter.
These individuals have every right to be on activist listservs, yet their intentions should be called into question. Rarely, if ever, are they present for community actions held by these organizations. The aforementioned examples suggest that their objective is to monitor local activist groups, not to play the leadership role they have assumed.
While local authorities were collecting our emails, they refused to return our phone calls. Something which has received little attention in local coverage of the story is that after Carrington was shot, police broke down the back door at 906 W. Vine and ransacked the house. The woman who lived there, Deborah Thomas, was not able to return to her home that night. The next day, black community activist Martel Miller left messages with Champaign police to address the situation, but he did not hear back from them. Deputy Chief Holly Nearing sent an email to Troy Daniels and Assistant to the Police Chief Rene Dunn, cc’ing Chief Finney. It read, “Martel Miller is calling the PD wanting to know why we are not providing the resident at 906 W. Vine a secure house or a place to stay. Any ideas on responding to the resident?”
Immediately after the incident, Carrington’s family was not allowed to identify the body of their loved one. Instead, police used a school photograph to identify him. On Oct. 10, Holly Nearing wrote to Troy Daniels and Chief Finney indicating that the family wanted to view Carrington’s body. She also made mention, “Brian Dollinar [sic] is involved in this viewing issue, he has been calling the front desk.” My phone calls were never returned and the family did not view the body until three days after he was killed.
Meanwhile, city council members were communicating about the case with the State’s Attorney while the investigation by the state police was pending. On Oct. 21, Deb Feinan sent an email to Julia Rietz that only included the message, “Julia, Please give me a call when you get a chance. Deb.” On Oct. 27, Marci Dodds forwarded the names of two potential witnesses to Rietz with the personal note, “It was fun to see you on Sunday.”
Documents acquired under the Freedom of Information Act reveal significant communication between Champaign city officials, Champaign police, and the State’s Attorney. Even while they urged the community to be patient, emails show that they rushed to handle damage control in the aftermath of the police shooting.
- 3762 reads

FOI documents
Will the actual FOI documents of this email traffic be posted publically online or elsewhere so that members of the public can access and read them in their entirety rather than in bits and pieces via quotes from them, citations to them, or paraphrases of their contents?
Members of the public can
Members of the public can always submit their own FOIA to get these documents.
BD
AKA, We don't want to release
AKA,
We don't want to release the entire list because it will damage our propoganda machine
AKA?
If you want to read them, file your own FOIA. It really isn't that hard.
AKA
Or they could just be posted on this website. What would that hurt?
I agree with AKA
I am very likely to believe your interpration except for the fact that you are being shady about posting the actual emails......if thats true, that will really damage the imc local rep...
""Meanwhile, city council
""Meanwhile, city council members were communicating about the case with the State’s Attorney while the investigation by the state police was pending. On Oct. 21, Deb Feinan sent an email to Julia Rietz that only included the message, “Julia, Please give me a call when you get a chance. Deb.” ""---- Communicating "about the case" and "only included the message"??? How are you certain that the comment refers to the case.....Weak reasoning, is the rest of the emails interpreted this loosely?
We'd All Be Better Off
I think we'd all be better served if those on the city's payroll spent more of their time and attention solving the many obvious issues that are on their plate regarding the subjects under discussion in the correspondence involved, than in focusing on individuals they seem to be discussing in these emails. Their obsession with who is saying what about them is a bit misplaced. They ought to be doing their jobs and there would be less need of looking over their shoulders.
It also seems to me that that a smilar obsession is setting in among some of the anonymous commentors here. I think the article does a pretty good job of documenting the gist of what's in the emails, etc. Want to elaborate? Then do your own legwork.
And really, they're public documents. The city could -- and maybe should -- have posted them online in the first place. An open and transparent government would do that as the default mode. They can still do so. If people want them online, they should call Mayor Jerry and ask him to get that done.
Hysterical.
"I think the article does a pretty good job of documenting the gist of what's in the emails, etc."
Yes, it does. Here's the gist:
“As you probably know, there is a press conference at 10 a.m. Monday at the Independent Media Center.”
Gee, I thought Brian WANTED people to know about that press conference.
That press conference, by the way, is where we learned that Kiwane never got into any trouble except truancy.
“I thought you would like to see the latest in case you haven’t seen it.”
Shocking!!!
"An email from earlier in the week on Monday indicates that Will Kyles, the only African American city council member, was trying to pacify the city authorities about Meeks’ visit. Steve Carter sent a message to Dorothy David, Joan Walls, and Chief Finney saying that Kyles had told him the “primary reason” Meeks was in town was not for the Carrington case, but to “solicit support for [Cheryle] Jackson’s bid for the US Senate…. He was not intending to get involved in the community issue. Will wanted me to pass that along.” When Meeks was told about Carrington’s killing the next day by members of CUCPJ, he willingly spoke to the community."
It sounds to me like the primary reason was to make clear the truth about an incident. CUCPJ could learn something from this.
But you know, what that e-mail has to do with their dastardly COINTELPRO-like assault on your civil liberties is beyond me.
“Martel Miller is calling the PD wanting to know why we are not providing the resident at 906 W. Vine a secure house or a place to stay. Any ideas on responding to the resident?”
That's a fair question, isn't it? Should they NOT be talking about that?
"“Brian Dollinar [sic] is involved in this viewing issue, he has been calling the front desk.”"
It's not "monitoring" you when YOU keep calling the police front desk and they pass that information on to the Chief.
“Julia, Please give me a call when you get a chance. Deb.”
*GASP!*
“It was fun to see you on Sunday.”
Wow, Brian!!! I can't even believe you re-printed that one! It's just so... so horrible!
"Documents acquired under the Freedom of Information Act reveal significant communication between Champaign city officials, Champaign police, and the State’s Attorney."
Yep. And this should come as a shock to anyone because... ?
"Even while they urged the community to be patient, emails show that they rushed to handle damage control in the aftermath of the police shooting."
No it doesn't. It shows them talking to each other about your asinine little press conference and giving each other information about two potential witnesses. I don't see ANYTHING about them rushing to handle damage control.
Really, what happened here is that the IMC and CUCPJ desperately want to feel like they're important enough for the city to take notice of. They're not, really, except as sort of a nuisance. I disagree that it's paranoid delusions they're suffering from. It's more like delusions of grandeur.
And, of course, they're STILL desperate to make it seem like the police somehow acted badly in the wake of the Kiwane Carrington incident. Not because of anything the police DID, mind you. But just because they don't like the police.
"I think we'd all be better served if those on the city's payroll spent more of their time and attention solving the many obvious issues that are on their plate regarding the subjects under discussion in the correspondence involved, than in focusing on individuals they seem to be discussing in these emails."
Umm. I bet the total time it took to write these e-mails, all added together, was about forty-five seconds.
And considering that, for a month, there really wasn't very much the city council or state's attorney could DO, since the state police report wasn't even done yet, I think forty-five seconds is a justifiable expenditure of time.
"Their obsession with who is saying what about them is a bit misplaced."
Where do you see any obsession about what anyone is saying about them in those e-mails? I don't see it anywhere. Now, Brian's obsession about who is saying what about CUCPJ? Well, that's pretty obvious.
"It also seems to me that that a smilar obsession is setting in among some of the anonymous commentors here. I think the article does a pretty good job of documenting the gist of what's in the emails, etc. Want to elaborate? Then do your own legwork."
Right, but you see the humor of it, don't you? These e-mails that Brian put up are so completely innocuous. They mean NOTHING! And if that's the WORST he can come up with, it's even more obvious than usual that he's just grasping at straws.
And personally, I think Brian's time would be better spent dealing with an issue involving peace and justice in our community. Namely, this case:
http://www.news-gazette.com/news/courts_crime_fire/2009/12/23/man_attack...
He should be focusing on this issue, rather than obsessing over who is saying what about his stupid little organizations.
Go to it, Brian!
Really?
Isn't it possible that city officials are interested in the public's response to this issue because they're interested in the public's response to this issue? City government doesn't run polls to figure out what the public is thinking...they have to pick up clues from the public: read op-eds. and letters to the editor, listen to people who speak at city council meetings, and yes, pay attention to what citizen groups are doing. At the national level you have staffs who do nothing but read the newspaper for any kind of constituency concern. And interest groups alert officials to any activity on the part of their constituencies. I honestly don't see how this is any different.
Would you rather government ignore the citizens' concerns about this? It's not like they were intercepting email or phone conversations for goodness sake.
OMG
Paranoia is a thought process heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion. The IMC holds a press conference and is upset that a member of a media outlet mentioned that to a city official?
Or that public officials were discussing public reaction to community events?
Definitions
Paranoia is wrapping your cop shop in yellow tape and filling the lobby with officers because you're afraid of a bunch of kids marching past.
Anxiety is what happens when you realize you just f-ed up in a very major way.
Fear is the only thing some kid felt right before he was shot.
Irrationality is pretending that if it's not a clear-cut case of first degree murder, the only other thing a shooting by a cop can be is "only an honest mistake and an accident."
Delusion is hoping that hiding behind your badge will make the consequences of your arrogant treatment of citizens go away.
LUNACY/IGNORANCE/IRRESPONSIBI
LUNACY/IGNORANCE/IRRESPONSIBILITY is implying that Carrington was murdered.
Shouting It
Shouting it won't convince people it was simply an accident that needs no further legal action.
Given CPD's long history of overaggressive behavior towards certain segments of our community, it should come as no surprise that many people consider that there was clear evidence that reckless behvior was involved -- BEFORE the "summary" was released by Ms. Rietz.
Now that some of the facts have surfaced, it's irresponsibile to say that it was simply an "accident."
I didn't say it was simply an
I didn't say it was simply an accident. I just said that it wasn't "first degree murder"
Who Said That?
After reading through this thread again, I don't see anyone who said it was murder. In fact, with rare exceptions, for the most part no has said it was "first degree murder" at any point since Oct. 9. So I think you have just thrown a rather speculative red herring out there.
It's good that you are keeping an open mind about it being more than just an accident. You're doing better about being open minded on that score than Rietz.
Pass it on to the lawyer
There might be a few tidbits in these emails that might be useful to James Montgomery Jr, who has filed a lawsuit on behalf of Kenesha Carrington:
"The sister and guardian of Kiwane Carrington has sued the city and the officer involved in her brother's death.
James Montgomery Jr. of Chicago, son of University of Illinois Trustee James Montgomery Sr., filed a wrongful-death suit Nov. 16 in Champaign County Court on behalf of Kenesha Williams, who is the representative of Mr. Carrington's estate.
The Carrington suit alleges that Officer Daniel Norbits, who is now on administrative leave, along with Champaign Police Chief R.T. Finney, confronted Mr. Carrington on Oct. 9.
According to the suit, the officer "pushed Kiwane Carrington back on to the threshold of the door in the side yard of 906 W. Vine St. ... Defendant City of Champaign, acting by and through Daniel Norbits, pointed his gun ... and fired a shot into the chest of Kiwane Carrington."
At the time, the suit said, Mr. Carrington "was not armed with any gun or any other deadly weapon, nor did he pose a threat to defendant city of Champaign or its agents," Norbits or Finney.
Neither Finney nor Norbits could be reached for comment Tuesday evening."
News-Gazette, Dec 9
Glad to hear they have a really good lawyer.
David Roknich
Galesburg, Illinois
Thanks
Thanks for this information. I'm even more sad than before.simulation
Post new comment